Commodification of the Body
![]() |
| Source: http://bit.ly/KX9XEw |
![]() |
| Source: http://bit.ly/Kn42Mg |
The advertisement for PETA, features a model with her body divided into labeled segments, and is accompanied by the phrase, “all animals have the same parts” at the top of the image. This is a simple display of body objectification. It implies that the body is just a composition of common parts, this takes out any sort of personal human aspect, and claims that the body is purely an object. The words emphasize this point by eliminating the possibility for an individual to possess any unique traits. This is similar to a concept we discussed in class. In lecture we read an article about a young boy who sold his liver in order to make money so that he could purchase an iPad. The article is similar to the ad above, in that it commodifies the body, it makes it into something that can be divided and used as “parts”. As we discussed in class, dehumanizing the body makes questions of morality much more complex. Where do we draw the line? Is the body truly an object? Or is there more to it, does human personality need to be taken into account? The commodification displayed in our society almost daily, seems to imply that the body is purely an object that is meant to be utilized as a tool.
![]() |
| Source: http://bit.ly/K6v23I |
Stuart Ewen expresses these ideas in
the article entitled “Form Follows Power”. Ewen states that in
the past the “soldier bore the marks of muscular strength, but it
was also implicit that this strength was intrinsic to the man. He
was motivated, from within, by natural courage and pride, not by the
techniques of externally imposed discipline” (195). The modern
understanding of strength has become distanced from the man as a
person. The calculated body is broken down into parts and is
strengthened with a specific goal in mind. When the body is commodified, it is separated from the mind and its desires.
Reading:
Ewen, Stuart 1988. Form Follows Power. Pp. 185-232.
Reading:
Ewen, Stuart 1988. Form Follows Power. Pp. 185-232.



No comments:
Post a Comment